|
About
the data

Table
of Contents
Overview
Accuracy of the Data
Techniques Used to Ensure
Data Accuracy
Validation and Review
Carcinogenicity
Acute Toxicity
Reproductive and Developmental
Toxicity
Endocrine Disruption
Neurotoxic Cholinesterase Inhibitors
Regulatory Status
Ecotoxicity
California Pesticide
Use Data
Value-Added Features
Ecotoxicity Summaries
Parent/Related Chemical
Groupings
References and
Definitions
Water & Pesticides Information Center
Overview
The PAN Pesticide Database
brings together a diverse array of information on pesticides from
many different sources, providing human toxicity (chronic and acute),
ecotoxicity and regulatory information for about 6,400 pesticide
active ingredients and their transformation products, as well as
adjuvants and solvents used in pesticide products.
This database of active
ingredients has been integrated with the U.S. EPA product databases,
which provide information on formulated products (the form of the
pesticide that growers and consumers purchase for use) containing
the active ingredients. The information is most complete for pesticides
registered for use in the United States.
References to data sources
can be found by clicking on the underlined term describing the data
or by going to the Pesticide Tutorial from the sidebar menu
of this page or from the home page.
Top
of page
Accuracy
of the data
To ensure
that our data are accurate and have been peer reviewed by scientists,
we do not use anecdotal evidence of any sort in the PAN web site.
All of our information is backed up by rigorous scientific studies
and most of the data are taken from official sources of weight-of-the-evidence-type
evaluations when they are available. When official lists do not
exist, we have presented a variety of original data sources that
refer to the peer-reviewed scientific literature. The specifics
are highlighted below for each toxicity type.
Top
of page
Techniques
Used to Ensure Data Accuracy
Most of the
toxicity information comes directly from official sources such as
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), World Health
Organization (WHO), National Toxicology Program (NTP), National
Institutes of Health (NIH), International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC), the European Union (EU), and the State of California.
The fact that
most of the data are available in electronic form nearly eliminates
the possibility of data entry errors, so if our official data sources
are correct, the PAN data are too. Interestingly, what we have found
is that these official lists themselves have a number of errors.
The fact that we are comparing multiple lists allows us to find
and correct errors in identifying numbers, chemical classifications
and use types. Because of this extensive cross-comparison between
data sets, errors and inconsistencies are quickly found and corrected.
Top
of page
Validation
and Review
For validation and review,
the Beta version of every substantial revision of the database is
sent to about 200 individuals with a request for feedback and criticism.
We typically receive about 50 formal reviews back from chemists,
toxicologists, biologists, geologists, activists, and regulators,
and modify the database based on their suggestions.
In short, we
believe our data set of summary pesticide information to be the
best one available on the Internet. Where we've interpreted the
original information to create summaries or comparisons, we have
clearly documented our methods so the technique is transparent and
the user can judge for him/herself the validity of the approach.
Top
of page
Carcinogenicity
We utilize five different
sources of carcinogenicity data: The International Agency for Research
on Cancer, the U.S. National Toxicology Program, California's Proposition
65 list, the U.S. EPA Toxics Release Inventory list, and the U.S.
EPA Office of Pesticide Programs List of Chemicals Evaluated for
Carcinogenic Potential. The ratings presented are taken directly
from the source list and all are based on weight-of-the-evidence
evaluations. Cancer data are current as of April 8, 2007. More detail
about cancer listings can be found here.
Top
of page
Acute
Toxicity We
utilize up to four different sources of acute toxicity data: The
World Health Organization's Hazard Rankings, the U.S. National Toxicology
Program acute toxicity data, U.S. EPA ratings (Category I-IV) of
technical grade pure active ingredients (where a consensus rating
exists) and Material Safety Data sheets. Acute toxicity data are
current as of April 8, 2007. More detail about acute toxicity data
can be found here.
Top
of page
Reproductive
and Developmental Toxicity Information
on reproductive and developmental toxicants is obtained from two
sources, the State of California's Proposition 65 list of chemicals
and the U.S. EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) list. Again, because
the data are entered electronically, our list is as correct as the
source lists. Reproductive and developmental toxicity data are current
as of April 8, 2007. More detail about the Proposition 65 list can
be found here
and about the U.S. EPA TRI list here.
Top
of page
Endocrine
Disruption It
is more difficult to find an "official" list of endocrine disrupting
chemicals, since the U.S. EPA has not yet created such a list, although
the screening of chemicals to determine the endocrine-disrupting
abilities of a large number of chemicals is in progress. Our
endocrine disruptor list was taken from a variety of sources summarizing
endocrine disrupting effects of chemicals. All of these summary
lists are based on research in the scientific literature where endocrine
disrupting effects have been observed for humans or animals. Endocrine
disruption data are current as of April 8, 2005. More detail about
the endocrine disruptors can be found here.
Top
of page
Neurotoxic
Cholinesterase Inhibitors
The list of
cholinesterase inhibitors started with California Department of
Pesticide Regulation and U.S. EPA lists; however, these documents
only include pesticides registered for use in the U.S. There are
many organophosphorus pesticides used in developing countries which
we designated as cholinesterase inhibitors based on chemical structure.
Because the mechanism of action of the organophosphates and phosphorothioates
has been determined, a particular chemical structure can be reliably
associated with the toxic effects associated with cholinesterase
inhibition.
The carbamate pesticides
were more difficult, since a slight change in chemical structure
renders them inactive as cholinesterase inhibitors. For these, Materials
Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) were used to designate a pesticide as
a cholinesterase inhibitor. Cholinesterase inhibitor data are current
as of April 8, 2005. More detail about cholinesterase inhibitors
here.
Top
of page
Regulatory
Status The
regulatory status of a particular chemical (active or cancelled)
for the U.S. was taken directly from U.S. EPA's Pesticide Product
Information System (PPIS) product data and California Department
of Pesticide Regulation's list of active ingredients. U.S. EPA product
information data are current as of April 8, 2005, which is EPA's
January 2005 product data set. Our information on Prior Informed
Consent (PIC) and Persistent Organic Pollutant chemicals is from
the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) web sites and is
current as of April 8, 2005. Information on active ingredients registered
for use in countries around the world was obtained from the appropriate
government authority. The currency of each of these data sets is
provided in the references section of each country
page. More detail about regulatory information here.
Top
of page
Ecotoxicity
All
Ecotoxicity information is taken from the U.S. EPA AQUIRE database.
We have simplified the data somewhat by summarizing some information
(see below in Value-Added Features), but
the original data are available for the user to evaluate as well.
The ecotoxicity data are the latest available as of April 8, 2005,
which is the January 2004 data set. More details about ecotoxicity
can be found here.
Top
of page
California
Pesticide Use Reporting Data
We obtain the California PUR data directly from the Deparment of
Pesticide Regulation and do a number of data processing steps to
clean up the data and summarize the information by all combinations
of crop, chemical, and location. Our methodology for processing
the data is described in detail here.
The data include all years from 1991 through 2003. The California
PUR data are current as of April 8, 2005. We anticipate the 2004
data to be released near the end of 2005.
Top
of page
Value-Added
Features
Two additional
features of the database are a result of our own work, rather than
simply bringing existing lists together. These are the Ecotoxicity
Summaries and the Parent Chemical/Related chemical groupings.
Ecotoxicity
Summaries
The Ecotoxicity
Summaries provide a narrative ranking of toxicity by both organism
group and by species. For example, a look at the Chemical Information
page for Diazinon shows the following summary information by organism
group:
|
Organism
Group
|
Average
Acute Toxicity
|
Acute
Toxicity Range
|
| Amphibians |
Slightly
Toxic |
Moderately
to Slightly Toxic |
| Annelida |
Moderately
Toxic |
Moderately
Toxic |
| Crustaceans |
Highly
Toxic |
Very
Highly to Moderately Toxic |
| Fishes |
Moderately
Toxic |
Very
Highly to Slightly Toxic |
| Aquatic
Insects |
Highly
Toxic |
Very
Highly to Moderately Toxic |
| Molluscs |
Moderately
Toxic |
Very
Highly to Slightly Toxic |
| Zooplankton |
Highly
Toxic |
Very
Highly to Moderately Toxic |
By giving both
the range and the average rating, a summary view is provided with
no loss of the extreme ends of the data set. The original data are
also just one click away, where the user can view each individual
study. Summaries are also provided by species. Details on how the
summaries were created can be found here.
Top
of page
Parent/Related
Chemical Groupings
The Parent/Related
Chemical groupings provide the user with information about related
chemicals. Many compounds in the database are chemically similar
to each other; however, typically only one of a group of similar
compounds has been evaluated for its toxicological properties. We
call this compound the "parent." In many (but not all) cases, other
related chemicals will have similar toxicological effects and/or
similar chemical reactivity. We wanted to formally group similar
compounds to make it possible for the user to:
-
Know which compounds are chemically similar
-
View the toxicological properties of the parent compound when evaluating a related compound
The Chemical
Classification (organophosphorus compounds, urea compounds, etc.)
is one way of broadly categorizing chemicals. By creating Parent/Related
Chemical rollup categories, we have taken this classification scheme
to a finer level of detail. Details about how Parent/Related Chemical
groups were assigned can be found here.
Top of page
Definitions and References
All data sources
are fully referenced, and an enterprising user will be able to very
quickly obtain the original data sets. The Pesticide
Tutorial overview page provides an index to the different data
sets, also accessible by clicking on any of the underlined terms
on the data pages. The reference documents define the terms, cite
the data sources, and discuss the accuracy, currency, and comprehensiveness
of each source. There are also links to the original data source,
if the data are on the web.
Top of page
The Water & Pesticides Information Center
The Water & Pesticides Information Center (WaterPIC) brings together California Pesticide Use Reporting (PUR),
surface water sampling, and water quality standard information in one site. Based on
geographic area, time period, and pesticide selections, the WaterPIC dynamically generates
data tables and graphs that can be used to understand relationships been pesticide uses
and surface water pesticide concentrations. The About
the WaterPIC Data pages provide details about the original data sources, quality
control measures, and methods used to analyze and compile this information. For instruction
on how to use the WaterPIC, please see the Pesticide Tutorial pages.
Top of page
Last updated April 6, 2007
.
|